Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Student contrasts

I think I had the perfect contrast between good students and bad students in microcosm today.

My students entered my class late this afternoon with ham-acted "I want to die" statements. When I asked for why they were so universally wishing for death, they said they had too much work in their previous class.


Them: "We had to write 70 words in 45 minutes."
Me: boggles
Me: "That's less than two words per minute. Come crying to me when you're told to write 500."
Them: "But English is your native language."
Me: "OK, I'll do it in German, then, if you like. Or even French."
Them: boggle

They were really not happy when I gave them an exercise (pre-planned! I swear!) in which they had to ad-lib a speech that worked out to roughly 300-450 words....

Now in this class I have a "guest". He's a student in another program (computer technician) who has decided he needs to improve his English skills so he sits in on my classes when he's got free periods. He also talks with me as I go home after class to help practice. Today, on the way home, he mentioned that he had been finding his classes very difficult this term to the point of wanting to give up. As I was about to encourage him he blithely continued, explaining that this had changed after he went to the library and studied some supplemental material that was easier to understand than what the teacher was giving in class.

And that, in a microcosm, is the difference.

Poor students only go to class and bitch and moan about doing even miniscule amounts of work. They don't do any work outside of the classroom unless forced to (and then usually cheat anyway, thus invalidating the whole point of self-study).

Good students, when faced with adversity, work harder to learn by taking extra classes, spending extra time studying, finding other sources of information, etc.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

The dangers of cross-cultural plagiarism

I'm doing a bit of textbook editing on the side. As is usual here, the material is mostly cribbed from elsewhere with the questions sometimes done by the "writer" and sometimes themselves cribbed from elsewhere.


This can lead to disaster as it would have been in this case had they not asked me to do some editing for them.

In one section of the book there's an activity to make a restaurant menu. They have a sample menu at the top of the page as a model. Here's what the model menu says:

WONG WONG's
CHINESE FOOD MENU

LUNCHEON SPECIALS

SUM YUNG CHICK $6.99
Different And Delicious
WON HUNG LO $6.99
Chinese Meatballs
CHU SUM TWAT $16.99
Dinner Parties Of Three Or More
SUC MI PORK $9.69
Chef's Special
FUC YU MAN $6.69
Speciality Of The House

DINNER COMBINATIONS

1. GOO IN HAND...$9.69
For Those Dining Alone
2. GOO WEE CHICK $6.99
Sloppy Seconds No Charge
3. CUM TOO SOON $6.99
Order Early These Go Fast
4. SUC MI WANG $6.99
Traditional Chinese Meatloaf
5. SUM DUM CHICK $4.99
You Get What You Pay For
6. LIK MI CLIT $6.99
Delicious Lip Smacking Oriental Delicacy
7. CHO KON IT $9.99
Not For The Light Throated
8. FUC SUM NOW $6.99
For Those In A Hurry
9. TUNG SUM CHICK $8.99
A Taste Bud Tingler
10. SUM GULP CUM $9.69
Low Cal Diet Special

As funny as it would be to leave that all there, professionalism and ethics kick in. I'm going to have to warn them. :(